ReviewJournal of medical systems2026
Deep Learning and Noninvasive Sensors for Detecting Physiological Dysregulation: A Scoping Review.
Review in Journal of medical systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early detection of pain, stress, or hemodynamic instability is key to preventing serious clinical events. In recent years, non-invasive sensors and deep learning algorithms have gained relevance as tools for accurate and continuous monitoring. To map and synthesize the scientific evidence on the use of non-invasive multimodal sensors combined with deep learning algorithms for the early detection of physiological dysregulation states, including pain, stress, and hemodynamic deterioration, in patients over 13 years of age in clinical settings. A scoping review was conducted following the JBI and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. We included studies published between 2019 and 2025 in English or Spanish, identified through three databases and a secondary search. Twenty-seven studies were analyzed after duplicate removal and screening. Deep learning algorithms applied to electroencephalograms, electrocardiograms, photoplethysmography, and facial image signals showed high accuracy in predicting clinical events such as pain or hypotension. China and Australia had the highest number of included studies (n = 3), followed by South Korea, the United States, and Greece (n = 2 each). Retrospective and experimental designs predominated, with applications in intensive care units, operating rooms, and emergency rooms. These technologies represent an emerging strategy with high potential to improve early detection in clinical practice. However, further validation in real-world environments, optimization of implementation methods, and evaluation of their clinical impact are still needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.