ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Sustainable alternative feed ingredients: effects of palm kernel cake and decanter cake on broiler growth and production performance.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the potential of palm kernel cake (PKC) and decanter cake (DC) as sustainable feed ingredients for broiler chickens. A total of 1,200 one-day-old male chicks were reared for a 35-day experimental period. The birds were randomly allocated into 15 dietary treatment groups, with each group consisting of 8 replicates and 10 birds per replicate. Treatment 1 is considered the control diet, without inclusion of PKC or DC. Treatments 2 to 8 contained 2% to 14% PKC in 2% increments, while treatments 9 to 15 included DC at the same inclusion levels. Statistical analyses were conducted using the General Linear Model (GLM) in Statistical Analysis System (SAS) software. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the treatment effects, and Duncan’s multiple range test was used to determine significant differences between treatment means at p < 0.05. The results showed that higher inclusion levels of both by-products, particularly above 6%, adversely affected broiler growth performance by reducing (p < 0.05) birds’ body weight (BW), carcass weight, average daily gain (ADG) and European Broiler Index (EBI), while increasing (p < 0.05) feed intake (FI) and feed conversion ratio (FCR). Likewise, growth hormone receptor (GHR) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) transcription were unchanged, indicating that performance effects stemmed from nutritional rather than endocrine factors. However, meat quality traits such as pH and water-holding capacity remained unaffected (p > 0.05). This study suggests that DC and PKC can be included in broiler diets at levels up to 4–6%, as higher levels may negatively impact growth performance and carcass characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.