ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2026
Factors Associated With Time to Automated Insulin Delivery System Initiation in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes on Multiple Daily Injections.
Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAutomated insulin delivery (AID) systems for type 1 diabetes (T1D) improve HbA1C, increase time-in-range, and reduce hypoglycemia. However, starting AID systems involves multiple steps, from decision to initiation. This study quantified time to AID initiation (TT-AID) and factors influencing the timeline.
methodsThis retrospective study included adults with T1D at an academic diabetes center in Baltimore, Maryland who were on multiple daily injections and initiated an AID system for the first time since diagnosis from May 2022 to March 2025. Demographics and dates of AID decision, AID selection visit (optional), prescription, training, and initiation were extracted from electronic medical records. Time to AID initiation was measured, with differences by insurance and AID selection visit assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum and log-rank tests.
resultsParticipants included 114 adults with T1D [median age 38.9 years, 57% male, 21% Black, 75% commercial insurance, median diabetes duration 10.2 years (IQR = 3.5, 18.1)]. The median TT-AID was 89.5 days (IQR = 49, 132). The longest delay was between decision and training [median: 82.5 days (IQR = 43, 122)]. Patients attending the optional AID selection visit had significantly longer TT-AID compared with those who did not [112 (IQR = 79, 144) vs 55 (IQR = 35, 98) days,
conclusionAdults took roughly 3 months to initiate AID, with longer delays among those with public insurance and those attending AID selection visits. Streamlining AID system initiation may reduce delays and optimize outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.