ArticleUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Management of humeral shaft fractures in childhood and adolescence : Consensus report of the Pediatric Traumatology Section of the DGU].
Article in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humeral shaft fractures are rare in childhood, accounting for less than 5% of all pediatric fractures. Indirect trauma predominates in younger children, whereas direct trauma is more common in older patients. To date, no uniform recommendations exist regarding diagnostic evaluation or treatment management. Therefore, during the 13th and 14th scientific meetings of the Pediatric Traumatology Section (SKT), the available evidence was reviewed, the management strategies were critically discussed within an expert panel and a consensus was formulated.The management remains predominantly conservative, although the number of surgically treated cases is increasing. Potential humeral length discrepancies are generally clinically not a problem, whereas angular deformities exceeding 10° are cosmetically relevant. Owing to the extensive range of motion of the shoulder, functional impairment is generally not expected. In conservative treatment immobilization is recommended for 3-6 weeks, depending on the fracture type and patient age. Absolute indications for operative intervention include open fractures (> type II), unstable multilevel injuries of the affected arm and severe soft tissue damage that precludes adequate immobilization. Relative indications comprise polytrauma, traumatic brain injury, multiple or bilateral injuries, simple transverse fractures due to inherent instability and prolonged healing, anticipated noncompliance and patient preference. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) represents the gold standard for surgical management. Typical complications include radial nerve injury, technical difficulties during fixation and nonunion.Traumatic radial nerve palsy occurs in approximately 4% of cases. The treatment approach selected based on fracture morphology should be maintained. Primary nerve exploration is not initially required. High-resolution ultrasonography of the radial nerve should be performed within 1-2 weeks in both primary and secondary palsy. Nonstructural lesions typically recover spontaneously within 3-6 months. Early physiotherapy and occupational therapy are recommended in the presence of nerve deficits. In cases of an inadequate trauma mechanism, pathological fractures or potential indicators of child abuse must be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.