ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Explant analysis of two rhine cervical discs.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCervical disc replacement aims to preserve cervical spine motion and reduce the risk of adjacent segment disease. The Rhine cervical disc is a non-articulating, viscoelastic implant designed to replicate the natural biomechanics of the cervical spine. To date, no explant analyses of this device have been published. This study presents the explant analysis of two Rhine cervical discs retrieved from a 41-year-old female patient who had undergone two-level cervical total disc replacement, C4-C5 and C6-C7, for myeloradiculopathy.
methodsThe implants were removed approximately one year after the surgery due to increasing neck discomfort, recurrent neurological symptoms, and radiographic evidence of osteolysis. Explant analysis was performed on both implants to assess their physical condition and any associated tissue reactions.
resultsBoth explants were intact, however, notable findings included plastic deformation of the viscoelastic cores, particularly in the upper disc. The direction of shear deformation differed between the explants, anterior in the upper disc and posterior in the lower disc, suggesting asymmetric loading conditions. In addition, osteolysis was observed predominantly at the posterior aspect of the lower disc one year after implantation.
conclusionThese observations highlight deformation of the viscoelastic core in Rhine cervical discs. Whether this finding relates to surgical factors such as implant sizing and positioning, or to implant design itself, improper sizing and malpositioning may contribute to excessive shear forces, core deformation, and poor clinical outcomes. These factors are all important in implant survival and should be carefully considered. The deformation observed in the cores of the explants is consistent with viscoelastic polymer limitations reported in the literature for other viscoelastic cervical discs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41615440What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.