Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41615371›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026

Enhancing Molecular Diagnostic Accuracy in Genetic Eye Disorders Through a Personalized Re-Evaluation Strategy.

Pedro Moreira Martins, Inês Figueiredo, Nuno Cruz, Beatriz Rodrigues Gaspar, Rufino Silva, Ana Luísa Carvalho, João Pedro Marques

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pedro Moreira MartinsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Unidade Local de Saúde de Gaia e Espinho, Gaia, Porto, Portugal.
Inês FigueiredoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (HUC), Unidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra (ULS-C), Coimbra, Portugal.
Nuno CruzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (HUC), Unidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra (ULS-C), Coimbra, Portugal.
Beatriz Rodrigues GasparDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (HUC), Unidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra (ULS-C), Coimbra, Portugal.
Rufino SilvaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (HUC), Unidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra (ULS-C), Coimbra, Portugal.
Ana Luísa CarvalhoClinical Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC), Coimbra, Portugal.
João Pedro MarquesDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (HUC), Unidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra (ULS-C), Coimbra, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Although genetic testing is crucial to provide prognostic information in genetic eye disorders (GEDs), up to 35% of cases remain unsolved after testing. We aim to describe how a tailored re-evaluation strategy, using up-to-date molecular testing, case-by-case review, and integration of in silico tools may increase the diagnostic yield. Methods: A total of 988 individuals from 800 families evaluated at the largest Portuguese GED referral center (Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra) were included. All had a clinical diagnosis based on clinical findings and deep phenotyping and underwent genetic testing. Targeted re-evaluation included updated Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) panels, Exome Sequencing (ES) reanalysis, and assays for intronic variants, copy number variants, and ORF15-RPGR region. Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were reassessed using segregation studies, literature/database review, and bioinformatic tools. Results: Initial testing yielded a molecular diagnosis in 475 families (59.4%). Variant reclassification enabled 39 additional diagnoses. A personalized re-testing strategy resolved 43 more, either through updated NGS panels (11), ES-reanalysis (14) and identification of deletions, GC-rich, and intronic variants (22). Overall, the solved rate increased from 59.4% to 70.1%. An additional 45 families (5.6%) carry phenotype-consistent VUS that could not be reclassified at the present date (partially-solved cases). Conclusions: This personalized re-evaluation strategy, incorporating state-of-the-art genetic testing, evidence-based variant reclassification, and case review by a multidisciplinary team increased the solved rate by over 10%. Consequently, 86 additional families received a definitive diagnosis and accurate genetic counseling, underscoring the impact of periodic re-evaluation and continuous improvement in genetic testing methodologies.

Indexed as

Eye Diseases, HereditaryGenetic TestingMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPrecision MedicineExome SequencingFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMalePedigree

Identifiers

PMID41615371
PMCPMC12859735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.