Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41615345›Full record

ArticleJACC. Case reports2026

Complete or Partial Revascularization During Emergency PCI in a Patient With NSTEMI.

Shengjia Sun, Alimujiang Maimaitijiang

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shengjia SunDepartment of Cardiovascular Disease, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Alimujiang MaimaitijiangDepartment of Cardiovascular Disease, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: alimujiang@huashan.org.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimal management of nonculprit lesions remains uncertain in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) during emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). CASE SUMMARY: An NSTEMI patient underwent emergency PCI for electrocardiogram-indicated culprit lesion only. His nonculprit lesion progressed to asymptomatic total occlusion in 5 days despite medical therapy. DISCUSSION: This case highlights that in NSTEMI patients: 1) symptom resolution does not guarantee lesion stability; 2) complete revascularization should be considered for all unstable lesions during emergency PCI; and 3) intravascular imaging is useful to help identify unstable lesions during emergency PCI. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: Combine all symptoms, electrocardiographic findings, angiographic characteristics, and intravascular imaging to help identify and treat unstable lesions during emergency PCI in NSTEMI patients.

Indexed as

emergency PCINSTEMIunstable lesions

Identifiers

PMID41615345
PMCPMC13008537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.