ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2026
Expectation as a Risk for Covid-19-Related Olfactory Changes: Observations From the California Farmworkers Health Survey.
Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Expectation as a Risk for Covid-19-Related Olfactory Changes: Observations From the California Farmworkers Health Survey.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Some outcomes in medical and public health research, as well as clinical practice, must rely on patient reports and may be influenced by the prior knowledge of the patient. During the early months of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, changes in the sense of smell and taste were widely reported as a distinctive aspect of the new respiratory contagion. Using a Rubin Model of causal inference and data from a California Department of Public Health-sponsored survey of California farmworker health, we estimate that approximately half (56.5%) of infected patients reporting olfactory changes after a diagnosis of Covid-19 would not have reported olfactory changes if not made aware of their Covid-19 infection. The observations support a similar conclusion with respect to Covid-19-related changes in the sense of taste.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.