ArticleClinical transplantation2026
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy During Liver Transplant: The Anesthesiologist-Nephrologist Collaboration at a Tertiary University Hospital in Italy.
Article in Clinical transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcute kidney injury frequently complicates the end stages of liver diseases, worsening the condition of patients waiting for liver transplants. Continuous renal replacement therapy during liver transplant is still a limited experience, with large variability in the indication criteria. The recent KDIGO guidelines on acute kidney injury may help identify patients who could potentially benefit from the procedure. Therefore, close collaboration between intensivists and nephrologists is essential for shared criteria and treatment management. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety in clinical practice of a joint intraoperative continuous renal replacement therapy (IO-CRRT) program. Some aspects of clinical impact were analyzed as a secondary outcome.
methodsA collaborative organization between nephrologists and anesthesiologists was implemented at St. Orsola Hospital of Bologna (Italy) to manage liver transplant candidates with acute kidney injury. Feasibility, the main outcome, was assessed through adherence to clinical indications and operative details. We also compared a group receiving IO-CRRT (n = 20) and a historical control group (n = 13) without replacement therapy.
resultsNo substantial operative deviations from the program were found, excluding 4 patients mistakenly enrolled. The IO-CRRT group had better control of lactates, serum bicarbonate gain, and smoother acute sodium changes compared to controls.
conclusionThe overall organization proved to be feasible and safe, provided a high level of collaboration is guaranteed. The trend of some metabolic parameters appeared to benefit from IO-CRRT, which may reasonably help in balancing metabolism during liver transplant surgery. This strategy could increase the opportunity for transplant for some patients who otherwise would be excluded.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.