Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41615288›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2026

Personalized gene expression prediction in the era of deep learning: a review.

Viksar Dubey, Li Shen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Viksar DubeyCollege of Computing, Data Science, and Society, University of California, 2195 Hearst Avenue, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States.
Li ShenDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Human Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, United States.

Funding

Transcription Factors in Stimulant and Opioid ActionP01DA047233 · NIDA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI YASMIN L. HURD · 2019 to 2026
$16.5M
NIDA NIH HHS P01 DA047233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting gene expression from genomic sequences is a central goal in computational genomics. Recent advances have demonstrated that deep learning models trained on large-scale epigenomic datasets hold significant promise for this task. However, their success heavily depends on how they are applied: most models are trained exclusively on a reference genome, limiting their ability to capture individual-specific genetic variation. Consequently, while these models perform well on reference genomes, they often struggle when applied to personal genomic data. This review discusses recent efforts to overcome these limitations and explores methods aimed at improving the prediction of personalized gene expression. In particular, we compare the performance of deep learning models with traditional expression quantitative trait loci-based linear approaches, examining novel fine-tuning strategies, and highlighting the emergence of genomic language models. Across multiple studies, we find that deep learning models still face significant challenges in outperforming linear models for cross-individual gene expression prediction. Despite ongoing advances in model architecture and training methodology, accurately and robustly predicting personalized gene expression remains an open challenge in the field.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsPrecision MedicineHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsQuantitative Trait Locideep learninggene expressiongenetic variantsgenome AIpersonalized genomics

Identifiers

PMID41615288
PMCPMC12856953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.