ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Personalized gene expression prediction in the era of deep learning: a review.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data-driven prioritization of mouse strains for improved preclinical modeling of rare and common disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Topic "Application of Reproductive and Genomic Biotechnologies for Livestock Breeding and Selection".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting gene expression from genomic sequences is a central goal in computational genomics. Recent advances have demonstrated that deep learning models trained on large-scale epigenomic datasets hold significant promise for this task. However, their success heavily depends on how they are applied: most models are trained exclusively on a reference genome, limiting their ability to capture individual-specific genetic variation. Consequently, while these models perform well on reference genomes, they often struggle when applied to personal genomic data. This review discusses recent efforts to overcome these limitations and explores methods aimed at improving the prediction of personalized gene expression. In particular, we compare the performance of deep learning models with traditional expression quantitative trait loci-based linear approaches, examining novel fine-tuning strategies, and highlighting the emergence of genomic language models. Across multiple studies, we find that deep learning models still face significant challenges in outperforming linear models for cross-individual gene expression prediction. Despite ongoing advances in model architecture and training methodology, accurately and robustly predicting personalized gene expression remains an open challenge in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.