Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41615271›Full record

ReviewActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2026

Challenges to Infant Health Care in the Social Media Era: Misinformation and Medicalisation.

Lotta Immeli, Pamela Douglas, Kaija-Leena Kolho

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lotta ImmeliNew Children's Hospital, Pediatric Research Center, Helsinki University Hospital HUS and Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Pamela DouglasThe NDC Institute (Home of the Possums Programs), Brisbane, Australia.
Kaija-Leena KolhoNew Children's Hospital, Pediatric Research Center, Helsinki University Hospital HUS and Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-9170-8415

Funding

Finnish Foundation for Paediatric Research (L.I.)Lastentautien Tutkimussäätiö
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cry-fuss problems, breastfeeding difficulties and sleep issues commonly prompt parents to seek help for their infants. Many families turn to social media, where they encounter diverse service providers, conflicting advice and health misinformation. This may encourage medicalisation, treating normal developmental variation as a medical problem and paramedicalisation, the use of non-evidence-based therapies. Global search trends for non-evidence-based therapies and national registry data on diagnostic shifts (gastro-oesophageal reflux, allergic colitis, ankyloglossia) illustrate how paramedicalisation and medicalisation shape infant care. Addressing medicalisation and paramedicalisation requires understanding their drivers, recognising potential harms and focusing on how clinicians can better support families.

Indexed as

CommunicationInfant HealthMedicalizationSocial MediaHumansInfantinfantmedicalisationmisinformationsocial media

Identifiers

PMID41615271
PMCPMC13063358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.