ArticleTurkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences2026
Evaluation of Wound Healing Potential of (5-formylfuran-2-yl)Methyl Benzoates by
Article in Turkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Callus Induction inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF) derivatives, found in many natural products, exhibit various biological activities. Benzoate derivatives enhance cellular re-epithelialization without inducing cytotoxicity. This study aimed to evaluate the wound-healing potential of six benzoate derivatives of 5-HMF by usingan Materials and Methods: Six ester derivatives of 5-HMF were synthesized, and the molecular structures were elucidated by proton-1 nuclear magnetic resonance, carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance, and Quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. The effects of the compounds on neuronal and fibroblast cell survival were determined Results: The MTT test showed that M2, M3, M5, and M6 did not damage fibroblasts at any tested concentration (10 Conclusion: M3 and M5 promote cell migration and have the highest potential for wound healing among the compounds tested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.