Observational studyCoDAS2026
Clinical predictors of dysphagia in patients with sepsis in a high-complexity hospital: insights for early identification.
Observational study in CoDAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo characterize the swallowing function of patients with sepsis, describe the frequency of oropharyngeal dysphagia, examine the rehabilitation duration required, and identify clinical predictors associated with the occurrence of dysphagia in a high-complexity hospital setting.
methodsThis cross-sectional observational study included 35 patients diagnosed with sepsis, whose clinical severity was assessed using the National Early Warning Score (NEWS). Clinical and demographic data were collected from medical records. All participants underwent an initial screening with the Yale Swallow Protocol, and those identified at risk for dysphagia were further evaluated using the Dysphagia Risk Evaluation Protocol - Screening (DREP) and the Protocol for Introduction and Transition to Oral Feeding (PITOF). Swallowing functionality was classified using the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS).
resultsDysphagic patients had pulmonary infection as the primary source of sepsis, higher clinical severity, a greater prevalence of comorbidities such as neurological diseases and heart conditions, lower FOIS scores, increased need for alternative feeding routes, longer hospital stays, and a higher risk of mortality. The most frequent clinical signs included prolonged oral transit time, reduced laryngeal elevation, and aspiration indicators such as throat clearing and coughing after swallowing.
conclusionOropharyngeal dysphagia in patients with sepsis is associated with worse clinical outcomes, emphasizing the importance of early diagnosis and specialized management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.