ArticleCoDAS2026
Orofacial myofunctional changes and risk of dysphagia in older adults in the frailty process: a methodological study.
Article in CoDAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeto verify the agreement between the evaluation of orofacial myofunctional aspects and the risk of dysphagia in older people in the frailty process.
methodsmethodological study with 100 individuals from a referral center for older people, assessed using the Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation Protocol with Scores for Older People (OMES-O) and the Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Screening in Older Adults (RaDI). Information regarding participants' chewing disorders, age, and years of education was also collected. ROC curve analysis was performed, and sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were generated from this analysis.
resultsthe OMES-O presented a median of 236.5 points. Most participants were not at risk of dysphagia. The comparison between OMES-O and RaDI indicated no difference in the score of orofacial myofunctional aspects between individuals at risk and not at risk of dysphagia. Moreover, OMES-O was not associated with chewing alterations, age, or years of education.
conclusionThe evaluation of orofacial myofunctional aspects could not indicate the risk of oropharyngeal dysphagia in older adults in the frailty process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.