ArticleJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2026
Resource profiles and suicide attempts in youth with disabilities.
Article in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe issue of suicide among youth with disabilities transitioning into adulthood is a serious public health issue. In navigating this transition, youth with disabilities encounter unique obstacles that require careful consideration and support. This study aims to identify resource profiles among youth with disabilities and their association with suicide attempts in early adulthood.
methodsUsing data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), this study included 1,472 youth with disabilities. A Gaussian finite mixture model (GMM) was employed to identify underlying distinct groups of youth with disabilities based on their available resources.
resultsFour latent classes emerged: (1) Socioeconomically Advantaged and Socially Supportive (37%); (2) Socioeconomically Advantaged, but Socially Isolated (28%); (3) Socioeconomically Disadvantaged and Socially Isolated (20%); and (4) Socioeconomically Disadvantaged, but Socially Supportive (15%). Results from the generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) considering a longer transition period into adulthood up to age 32 and relevant time-varying factors found that youth in Socioeconomically Advantaged, but Socially Isolated and Socioeconomically Disadvantaged, but Socially Supportive had a significantly lower likelihood of suicide attempts compared to those in Socioeconomically Advantaged and Socially Supportive. The likelihood of suicide attempts for youth with learning disabilities was significantly lower than for those with physical disabilities, while a history of suicide attempts in adolescence and experience with a death by suicide of family members or friends increased the odds of suicide attempts.
conclusionsThe study highlights the heterogeneity of youth with disabilities, demonstrating how demographic characteristics, disability-specific needs, family and school environments and social support systems intersect to influence suicide attempt prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.