Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41615026›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026

A prospective hazard analysis of real-time adaptive helical tomotherapy.

Jonathan Hindmarsh, Scott Crowe, Jemma Walsh, Tanya Kairn, Sonja Dieterich, Jeremy Booth, Paul Keall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. A prospective hazard analysis of real-time adaptive helical tomotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jonathan HindmarshImage X Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Eveleigh, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8861-9445
Scott CroweCancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7028-6452
Jemma WalshCancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Tanya KairnCancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2136-6138
Sonja DieterichDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9921-4345
Jeremy BoothNorthern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4004-1109
Paul KeallImage X Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Eveleigh, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4803-6507

Funding

Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council APP1194004Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing the release in 2016 of the report of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 100, there has been growing interest in the use of prospective hazard analysis in radiation therapy. System Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) is an emerging technique in this domain that is particularly suited to processes that involve time sensitive collaboration, decision-making and/or automation. PURPOSE: The goal of this research was to use STPA to evaluate existing processes and procedures with an aim to identify improvements, gaps or unforeseen risks stemming from implementing real-time adaptive treatment on a helical tomotherapy platform.

methodsThe Radixact treatment delivery system (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA), an evolution of the Tomotherapy platform, incorporates upgrades such as the Synchrony system for real-time motion monitoring and treatment adaptation. In collaboration with a team from the radiation oncology department of a large public hospital, a prospective hazard analysis focused on the real-time adaptive capabilities of the Radixact Synchrony system was conducted using STPA. The system boundaries were defined and a control structure model comprising sub-systems and control actions was developed. Unsafe control actions were identified and broad-based causal scenarios were generated. The causal scenarios that were novel, specific to Synchrony or challenging to mitigate were selected for further analysis regarding impacts and potential causes, following which mitigation strategies were proposed, taking into consideration the hierarchy of controls.

resultsA control structure model encompassing the entire patient journey was developed, incorporating all the hardware and software components and human decision makers. The model consisted of 12 sub-systems and 21 control actions, resulting in 108 unsafe control actions and 595 causal scenarios. Sixty-one causal scenarios were selected for further analysis, for which mitigation strategies were proposed based on the hierarchy of controls. These included the development of better reference documentation, the systematic testing of the sensitivity of tracking performance to changes in tracking parameters, guidance around setting and documenting tracking parameters, and documentation review.

conclusionsSTPA was effectively used to assess the Radixact Synchrony system's real-time adaptive radiation therapy capabilities, providing insight into how the system could become unsafe throughout the patient journey. While focused on Radixact Synchrony and real-time adaptive radiation therapy, this study offers a transferable example of STPA application, from analysis initialization to mitigation, that can inform other safety assessments in radiation therapy.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedHumansProspective StudiesRadiotherapy Dosagehazard analysishelical tomotherapyradiotherapyreal‐time adaptive radiation therapy (ART)safetysystem theoretic process analysis (STPA)

Identifiers

PMID41615026
PMCPMC12857238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.