ArticleJournal of texture studies2026
Qualitative Insights From Practicing Speech and Language Therapists on Key Textural Attributes of Transitional Foods for Dysphagia Management.
Article in Journal of texture studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Food Classification for Swallowing Disorders Perception by Senior Population.Journal of texture studies · 2026Article
- Qualitative Insights From Practicing Speech and Language Therapists on Key Textural Attributes of Transitional Foods for Dysphagia Management.Journal of texture studies · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transitional foods, as defined by the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI), are foods that change texture with moisture or temperature. They show promise for dysphagia management, but their clinical use is limited due to unclear guidelines and insufficient understanding of their transitional characteristics. This study aimed to identify key textural attributes of transitional foods through qualitative insights from 15 practicing speech and language therapists in Singapore. Four focus group discussions were conducted, during which participants also evaluated 10 food samples using sensory testing and supplemented by parallel IDDSI testing. Thematic analysis revealed key criteria: rapid transition time (ideally 5-10 s), even texture change, minimal force for breakdown, cohesive bolus formation, and absence of stickiness or mixed consistencies. Foods transitioning with minimal effort, such as baby puff, baby milk biscuit ball, and baked meringue samples, were considered transitional (> 90% participant agreement), while those requiring greater mechanical manipulation or showing uneven transitions, such as cheese puff and chiffon cake, were deemed less suitable (≤ 50% agreement). Discrepancies between sensory evaluations and IDDSI test outcomes, such as for tofu pudding and gelatin jelly, highlighted limitations in current testing protocols, which use a 1-min observation period at ambient temperature and do not account for total mechanical effort. Participants also emphasized the importance of age-appropriate appearance, localized flavors, and practical considerations for implementation. These findings support refining definitions and testing methods for transitional foods and provide foundational data to guide future product development and standardization in dysphagia care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.