ArticleCurrent issues in molecular biology2026
Mitochondria-Associated Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane Biomarkers in Coronary Heart Disease and Atherosclerosis: A Transcriptomic and Mendelian Randomization Study.
Article in Current issues in molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCoronary heart disease (CHD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Mitochondria-associated endoplasmic reticulum membranes (MAMs) have recently emerged as critical mediators in cardiovascular pathophysiology; however, their specific contributions to CHD pathogenesis remain largely unexplored.
objectiveThis study aimed to identify and validate MAM-related biomarkers in CHD through integrated analysis of transcriptomic sequencing data and Mendelian randomization, and to elucidate their underlying mechanisms.
methodsWe analyzed two gene expression microarray datasets (GSE113079 and GSE42148) and one genome-wide association study (GWAS) dataset (ukb-d-I9_CHD) to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with CHD. MAM-related DEGs were filtered using weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). Functional enrichment analysis, Mendelian randomization, and machine learning algorithms were employed to identify biomarkers with direct causal relationships to CHD. A diagnostic model was constructed to evaluate the clinical utility of the identified biomarkers. Additionally, we validated the two hub genes in peripheral blood samples from CHD patients and normal controls, as well as in aortic tissue samples from a low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient (LDLR-/-) atherosclerosis mouse model.
resultsWe identified 4174 DEGs, from which 3326 MAM-related DEGs (DE-MRGs) were further filtered. Mendelian randomization analysis coupled with machine learning identified two biomarkers, DHX36 and GPR68, demonstrating direct causal relationships with CHD. These biomarkers exhibited excellent diagnostic performance with areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve exceeding 0.9. A molecular interaction network was constructed to reveal the biological pathways and molecular mechanisms involving these biomarkers. Furthermore, validation using peripheral blood from CHD patients and aortic tissues from the Ldlr-/- atherosclerosis mouse model corroborated these findings.
conclusionsThis study provides evidence supporting a mechanistic link between MAM dysfunction and CHD pathogenesis, identifying candidate biomarkers that have the potential to serve as diagnostic tools and therapeutic targets for CHD. While the validated biomarkers offer valuable insights into the molecular pathways underlying disease development, additional studies are needed to confirm their clinical relevance and therapeutic potential in larger, independent cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.