Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41614810›Full record

ReviewCurrent issues in molecular biology2025

Diagnostic Pathways and Molecular Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer: Current Evidence and Perspectives in Poland.

Bartosz Bichalski, Magda Bichalska-Lach, Dariusz Waniczek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current issues in molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bartosz BichalskiDepartment of Surgical Nursing and Propaedeutics of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 41-902 Bytom, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9218-6794
Magda Bichalska-LachDepartment of Surgical Nursing and Propaedeutics of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 41-902 Bytom, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2816-0298
Dariusz WaniczekDepartment of Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-514 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0410-8604

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed malignancy worldwide and remains a major challenge in contemporary oncology, where early detection is critical for improving treatment outcomes and survival. Despite significant progress in diagnostics and therapy, the epidemiology, risk factors, and molecular mechanisms driving CRC development continue to be intensively investigated. This paper provides an overview of current trends in CRC diagnosis and management, with particular emphasis on advances in molecular medicine and biological sciences. Screening recommendations in Poland are discussed, comparing invasive methods-such as colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, and CT colonography-with non-invasive stool-based tests (FOBT, FIT, sDNA-FIT), and evaluating their sensitivity, specificity, and impact on mortality reduction. Key tumor markers with diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive value, including CEA, CA19-9, mSEPT9, ctDNA, TPS, TAG-72, CTCs, and circulating microRNAs, as well as p53 and PTEN proteins, are reviewed in the context of their clinical utility in early detection, disease monitoring, and treatment response assessment. The analysis also highlights the epidemiological situation in Poland and underscores the growing importance of integrating molecular biomarkers with traditional diagnostic methods, which may ultimately support the development of more precise and individualized clinical management strategies in the future.

Indexed as

biomarkerscolorectal neoplasmsearly detectionmass screening

Identifiers

PMID41614810
PMCPMC12732224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.