ArticleCurrent issues in molecular biology2025
PixelCut: A Unified Solution for Zero-Configuration 16S rRNA Trimming via Computer Vision.
Article in Current issues in molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Challenges and Advances in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
16S rRNA amplicon sequencing has been an effective method for profiling microbial taxonomy in microbiome research, as it offers lower per-sample costs and higher sample throughput than shotgun metagenomics. Although 16S rRNA sequencing offers clear advantages over shotgun sequencing, it depends on precise trimming of low-quality bases at the 3' ends of reads. Given the widespread use of 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, there is an increasing demand for analysis tools that can identify errors in the 3' region of reads and remove erroneous bases. While various algorithms for predicting trim locations are widely employed, most are command-line standalone tools, which pose challenges for users with limited computational background or resources. Furthermore, in the absence of biological or experimental priors such as amplicon size, trim position predictions may be unreliable. Here, we introduce PixelCut, a fully automated trim-position prediction framework that requires no hyperparameters or prior biological information for accurate prediction. Unlike most available algorithms that operate on raw FASTQ data, PixelCut analyzes the per-base quality report generated by FastQC to infer trimming positions. Based on the recommended quality score threshold from the quality report, PixelCut inspects the quality scores across bases and automatically determines the recommended trim position using character recognition techniques based on computer vision. We have also developed a user-friendly web application to make the method accessible to those without programming expertise, while offering a command-line version for advanced users. Through comprehensive computer simulations, we show that PixelCut produces taxonomic profiling results that are consistent with those from popular trim-location prediction algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.