ReviewImmunological reviews2026
Sex Differences in Alloimmunity and Other Immunological Considerations in Organ Transplantation.
Review in Immunological reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sex-based differences in human immunity are well-described in the general population, cumulatively favoring a more hyperinflammatory immune response among females in different scenarios. It is imperative to understand how this applies in the setting of transplantation, where dynamic immune function determines key clinical outcomes, including graft rejection and responses to infection. Sex differences unique to transplant immunity begin at the chromosomal level and are influenced by steroid hormones and sex-specific factors ranging from pre-existing pregnancy-induced alloimmunization to differential metabolism of routine immunosuppressive medications. Given active efforts for greater sex and gender equity in transplantation, and with increasing transplantation of older candidates, the unique immunological considerations at the cross-roads of biological sex and age are also critical to consider. Age is an important modifier of the relationship between sex and immune-related outcomes as young females appear to have a greater risk for poor outcomes related to alloimmunity compared to similarly-aged male counterparts, particularly when receiving an organ from a male donor. However, this risk does not endure in post-menopausal age categories and there are some limited data to suggest, in fact, that post-menopausal women may have a greater risk for transplant-related infection. Greater efforts to incorporate sex as a biological variable into transplant research will lead to a more tailored strategy for immunosuppressive management, rejection surveillance, infection prophylaxis and other considerations for optimization of transplant outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.