ArticleEuropean stroke journal2026
Optic nerve sheath diameter for prediction of intracranial hypertension after ischemic sTrokE - The ONSITE study.
Article in European stroke journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntracranial hypertension (IH) from brain edema is a life-threatening complication of large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke, yet clinical monitoring is often unreliable. Non-invasive methods for early IH prediction are needed. This study assessed whether sonographic measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) could improve the prediction of IH after stroke. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe prospectively measured the internal optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSDint) via transorbital ultrasound in 65 stroke patients and 30 controls. ONSD was also measured on the initial CT or MRI. The primary endpoint of IH was a composite of clinical and radiological signs of brain swelling. A predictive ONSD cut-off was determined from a multivariable logistic regression model, adjusted for age and infarct volume. Predictive performance was assessed using leave-one-out cross-validation.
resultsSeven of 65 stroke patients (11%) developed IH. The initial sonographic ONSDint was significantly increased in patients who developed IH. The multivariable model identified an optimal predictive cut-off of ⩾5.51 mm, which predicted IH with a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 94.8%. In comparison, ONSD derived from initial neuroimaging was also a strong predictor, with an optimal cut-off of 6.80 mm yielding a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 91.1%, and showed superior predictive accuracy in the cross-validation (AUC 0.905 vs 0.687). DISCUSSION: Our sonographic ONSDint cut-off of ≥5.51 mm aligns well with recent stroke literature that used similar standardized measurement techniques. Our findings also highlight the distinct roles of different imaging modalities. While the initial CT/MRI provides a static measurement with high predictive power, the unique advantage of sonography is its bedside applicability, allowing for the crucial, non-invasive serial monitoring of ONSD as a dynamic marker of intracranial pressure changes.
conclusionEarly ONSD assessment is a valuable predictor of IH after severe stroke. A sonographic ONSDint of ⩾5.51 mm identifies patients at high risk with excellent accuracy. While initial neuroimaging may offer superior predictive power, bedside sonography remains a crucial, repeatable tool for monitoring these critically ill patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.