ArticleEuropean stroke journal2026
Influence of spot sign on the association between rapidly achieving blood pressure reduction and intracerebral haemorrhage outcomes.
Article in European stroke journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection to.2026
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatients with a CTA spot sign could benefit more from interventions to limit ICH expansion. We evaluated whether its presence modifies the association between systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction and ICH outcomes. PATIENTS AND
methodsA prospective study of patients with ICH < 6 hours and SBP ≥ 150 mmHg at 2 Comprehensive Stroke Centers in Barcelona over 4.5 years. Patients underwent multiphase CTA (arterial, peak venous and late venous phases) and received treatment targeting SBP ≤ 140 mmHg ≤ 60 minutes. We assessed independent associations and interaction of achieving SBP target ≤ 60 minutes and spot sign status (arterial, or secondarily any phase) with hematoma expansion (>6 mL or > 33%) at 24 hours (primary outcome) and 90-day mRS.
resultsAmong 207 patients (mean age 71 ± 13.2 years, 134 [64.7%] male), 67 (32.4%) presented an arterial spot sign and 122 (58.9%) achieved SBP target ≤ 60 minutes. Target rates were similar with and without arterial spot sign (38 [56.7%] vs 84 [60.0%], P = .653). Hematoma expansion occurred in 46/177 (26.0%), and median 90-day mRS was 4 (2-5). Arterial spot sign and SBP target ≤ 60 minutes were independently associated with hematoma expansion (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.07; 95% CI, 1.74-9.89 and aOR 0.27; 95% CI, 0.11-0.64) and 90-day mRS (aOR 2.23; 95% CI, 1.23-4.07 and aOR 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24-0.76), with no interaction between them (P = .575 and P = .187, respectively). Similar results were observed considering spot sign in any multiphase CTA phase.
conclusionThe association between rapidly achieving SBP reduction and ICH outcomes appears neither dependent on nor modified by spot sign status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.