Observational studyEuropean stroke journal2026
Successful reperfusion for better outcomes in medium vessel occlusion: Penumbral salvage versus infarct volume reduction.
Observational study in European stroke journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe benefits of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) over medical treatment for medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) remain uncertain. Understanding how vascular reperfusion leads to favorable outcomes is crucial. This study examines whether penumbra salvage and infarct volume reduction quantify EVT benefits in MeVO patients and assesses their impact on clinical improvement post-reperfusion.
methodsWe conducted a multicenter, observational study analyzing MeVO patients who underwent thrombectomy and received multimodal CT imaging from January 2020 to June 2024. EVT efficacy was evaluated by measuring follow-up infarct volume (FIV) on CT scans 24-48 h post-procedure and calculating the penumbra salvage index (PSI). PSI is the ratio of salvaged tissue volume (difference between baseline delay time (DT) >3 s volume and FIV) to baseline DT >3 s volume. Mediation analysis assessed PSI and FIV's contributions to successful reperfusion and functional outcomes.
resultsOf 338 patients, 241 (72%) achieved successful reperfusion. Median FIV was 21 mL (IQR 12-32 mL), and median PSI was 0.68 (IQR 0.50-0.82). Successful reperfusion was linked to a 0.10 increase in PSI (95% CI: 0.05-0.15, p < 0.001) and a 4.36 mL reduction in FIV (95% CI: 1.31-7.20, p = 0.005). Successful reperfusion predicted improved outcomes, with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.92 (95% CI: 1.08-3.47, p = 0.020) for excellent outcomes (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-1) and an aOR of 1.70 (95% CI: 1.01-2.89, p = 0.024) for functional independence (mRS score 0-2). PSI and FIV accounted for 44% and 16%, respectively, of the effect of reperfusion on excellent outcomes.
conclusionsIn acute MeVO patients, penumbra salvage significantly mediates the beneficial relationship between reperfusion and excellent clinical outcomes, more so than infarct volume reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.