Observational studyEuropean stroke journal2026
The impact of comorbidity burden on outcomes following endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: A nationwide prospective observational study.
Observational study in European stroke journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPatients with substantial comorbidity burden are underrepresented in clinical trials on endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), despite being common in clinical routine care. Therefore, analysis of observational data is needed to evaluate how increasing comorbidity burden affects procedural success rate, complication rate, and clinical outcome following EVT. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe conducted a register-based observational study involving pre-stroke functionally independent patients treated with EVT in Sweden 2015-2021. Comorbidity burden was assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and categorized as no (CCI 0), moderate (CCI 1), severe (CCI 2), and very severe (CCI ⩾3). The primary outcome was favorable 90-day outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-2). Secondary outcomes included successful recanalization, and peri- and postoperative complications.
resultsOf 4735 included patients, 40% had no comorbidity (CCI 0), 15% had moderate (CCI 1), 21% had severe (CCI 2), and 24% had very severe comorbidity burden (CCI ⩾3). The yearly proportion of patients with very severe comorbidity burden increased from 16% to 30% during the study period. Increasing comorbidity levels were associated with decreased odds ratio (OR) of favorable outcome compared to patients without comorbidity: CCI 1 adjusted OR (aOR) 0.64, 95% CI 0.57-0.85; CCI 2 aOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.47-0.74; and CCI ⩾3 aOR 0.38, 95% CI 0.30-0.47, but there were no significant differences in successful recanalization rates. Patients with CCI 2 had higher OR for perioperative and postoperative complications (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.09-1.88, and OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.15-1.71), and patients in the CCI ⩾3 group had higher OR of postoperative complications (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.14-1.67), compared to patients in the CCI 0 group. Successful recanalization was associated with favorable functional outcome in all CCI-groups. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionSevere and very severe comorbidity burden are increasingly common among EVT-treated patients in routine healthcare and are linked to poorer outcomes. However, our results suggest that successful EVT is associated with functional independency, also in patients with severe and very severe comorbidity burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.