ReviewCA: a cancer journal for clinicians
Advances in the noninvasive diagnosis of melanoma-40 years beyond the ABCDs.
Review in CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The role of the WD40-repeat protein family in cancer.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Tumor lymph node metastasis chip reveals that the NECTIN3-TIGIT axis promotes melanoma metastasis by enhancing treg cell function and inducing CD8Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Advances in the noninvasive diagnosis of melanoma-40 years beyond the ABCDs.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The early detection of cutaneous melanoma is critical to survival outcomes. Because less than one half of melanomas in the United States are diagnosed by dermatologists, the ABCD (asymmetry, border irregularity, color variation, diameter >6 mm) acronym, created 40 years ago with the later addition of "E" for evolution (ABCDE), was developed for nondermatologist health care professionals and the public to simplify and enhance the diagnosis of early melanoma. It continues to be the global, naked-eye, nondevice-assisted standard for initial triage of pigmented lesions. This clinical review discusses the changing clinical diagnostic landscape and examines the currently available first-line and second-line detection modalities for melanoma. It also provides updates to the first-line triage approach and discusses the challenges of regulatory agency oversight for the safe and effective use of current and emerging skin cancer detection technologies. It is critical that health care professionals globally have knowledge of these technologies to enhance their diagnosis of melanoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.