ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026
CAR T therapy in adult DLBCL patients in Slovenia: Evaluation of predictive scores for outcomes and adverse events.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CAR T cell therapy is a promising immunotherapy for hematologic malignancies, yet early prediction of outcomes and adverse events remains difficult, especially in small real-world cohorts. We retrospectively analyzed 14 adult patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with CAR T cells in Slovenia, assessing IL-6 increase rates and established predictive metrics including EASIX-C, CAR-HEMATOTOX, and IBPS on Day -5 (pre-lymphodepletion) and Day 0 (infusion). Contrary to our expectation, an inverse correlation was observed between the increase rate of IL-6 and the occurrence of severe cytopenias, indicating higher IL-6 increase rate leads to less severe cytopenias. The EASIX-C score showed higher predictive values when calculated on Day 0, contrary to the CAR-HEMATOTOX score, whose higher predictive values were observed on Day -5. The IBPS predictive values showed mixed results when comparing Day -5 to Day 0. We observed 50% response rate and 29% remission rate. The results highlight the utility of predictive scores, with unexpected findings on IL-6 suggesting further study is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.