ArticleMedical education2026
A qualitative exploration of first-in-family medical students' decisions to partake in noncurricular activities.
Article in Medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A qualitative exploration of first-in-family medical students' decisions to partake in noncurricular activities.Medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesMedical students who are first in family (FiF) to attend college navigate an education system with limited social capital compared to their non-FiF peers. This situation leads to difficult decisions regarding the use of their time. How these students balance their goals inside and outside of medical school is an under-explored area within medical education research. By illuminating how FiF students decide what noncurricular activities to perform, this study aimed to better understand how they relate to and manage their time.
methodDrawing on aspects of constructivist grounded theory, we interviewed 15 US FiF students between September 2023 and May 2024 regarding the noncurricular activities they participated in and how they made decisions with their time. We collected and analysed data iteratively, adjusting the interview protocol as needed to probe deeper into ideas and themes. Formal data analysis included open and focused coding to identify patterns and relationships within and across the data to understand what drives FiF students in their decision-making processes and how this affects their activities.
resultsFiF students are constantly trying to secure their future, prioritizing their survival and that of their communities. They described how persisting through a lifetime of inequity instilled a skill for resourcefulness, and they draw on this experience when choosing activities. Their choices reflected a sense of what they must do, based on alignment with their personal values and a deep sense of responsibility to others.
conclusionsFiF students must choose activities that contribute to their survival and that of their communities. By illuminating that survival is at the centre of their decision-making, their narratives challenge the ways that medical training emphasizes extracurricular activities. By not necessarily choosing those activities that are expected of medical students, FiF students exert agency to reclaim aspects of their identity deemphasized by school expectations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.