ArticleClinical and translational science2026
Clinical and Economic Impact of Expanded TPMT Testing to Prevent Thiopurine-Induced Myelosuppression in Australia: A Budget Impact Analysis.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical and Economic Impact of Expanded TPMT Testing to Prevent Thiopurine-Induced Myelosuppression in Australia: A Budget Impact Analysis.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Testing thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) enzyme activity or genotype prior to thiopurine prescribing is recommended to reduce the risk of moderate to severe-and potentially fatal-myelosuppression in poor or intermediate TPMT metabolizers. Despite this, only about one-third of individuals prescribed thiopurines in Australia currently receive TPMT testing. The budgetary implications of expanding testing to align with guidelines remain unclear. We conducted a budget impact analysis from the Australian healthcare system perspective, comparing costs under current versus increased TPMT testing uptake. Phenotype frequencies among thiopurine users were estimated using ancestry-stratified prescribing data from the Person Level Integrated Data Asset of the Australian Bureau of Statistics combined with published phenotype distribution by ancestry. A simulation model was developed, incorporating phenotype frequencies, phenotype-specific hospitalization risks, and costs of testing and hospitalizations. In a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 thiopurine users, current testing rates of 32.5%-39.8% identify approximately 296 poor or intermediate metabolizers, leaving 586 individuals at elevated risk undetected. Increasing testing uptake by 10 percentage points from baseline could prevent 16 hospitalizations and save AUD$88,113 in hospital costs, leading to a mean net saving of AUD$42,728 (95% CI: AUD$41,685-AUD$43,770). The number needed to test to prevent one hospitalization was approximately 63. As myelosuppression represents a serious and potentially life-threatening adverse drug reaction, expanding TPMT testing offers a cost-effective, high-yield strategy to enhance patient safety and reduce preventable healthcare burden. These findings support more systematic integration of pharmacogenomic testing into routine thiopurine prescribing in Australia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.