ArticleSociology of health & illness2026
Contesting the C Word: The Diagnosis of DCIS and Women's Resistance Against Overtreatment.
Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Contesting the C Word: The Diagnosis of DCIS and Women's Resistance Against Overtreatment.Sociology of health & illness · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DCIS, or ductal carcinoma in situ-also known as Stage 0 breast cancer-accounts for approximately 20 per cent of new breast cancer cases. Although it is noninvasive, treatment typically mirrors that of invasive cancer. Whether DCIS is overtreated remains controversial, even among medical professionals. This study analyses discussions within a Facebook group of women diagnosed with DCIS who have declined the standard of care (SOC). The findings suggest that these women hold contrasting views on cancer risk compared to their healthcare providers. Although doctors focus on the potential for DCIS to progress to invasive cancer, the women emphasise the higher likelihood of nonprogression. Their considerations of alternative treatments are often dismissed by medical professionals, heightening the stress of an already anxiety-inducing diagnosis. This online community provides affirmation and support to those who choose holistic approaches to manage their condition. However, rejecting the SOC shifts the responsibility for healing onto the individual. These women must engage in vigilant self-surveillance, maintain strict healthy lifestyles and uphold an optimistic outlook-demands that require significant physical discipline and emotion work. This case carries important implications for both sociological research and medical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.