Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41614315›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2026

Contesting the C Word: The Diagnosis of DCIS and Women's Resistance Against Overtreatment.

Chien-Juh Gu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Chien-Juh GuDepartment of Sociology, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3169-6640

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DCIS, or ductal carcinoma in situ-also known as Stage 0 breast cancer-accounts for approximately 20 per cent of new breast cancer cases. Although it is noninvasive, treatment typically mirrors that of invasive cancer. Whether DCIS is overtreated remains controversial, even among medical professionals. This study analyses discussions within a Facebook group of women diagnosed with DCIS who have declined the standard of care (SOC). The findings suggest that these women hold contrasting views on cancer risk compared to their healthcare providers. Although doctors focus on the potential for DCIS to progress to invasive cancer, the women emphasise the higher likelihood of nonprogression. Their considerations of alternative treatments are often dismissed by medical professionals, heightening the stress of an already anxiety-inducing diagnosis. This online community provides affirmation and support to those who choose holistic approaches to manage their condition. However, rejecting the SOC shifts the responsibility for healing onto the individual. These women must engage in vigilant self-surveillance, maintain strict healthy lifestyles and uphold an optimistic outlook-demands that require significant physical discipline and emotion work. This case carries important implications for both sociological research and medical practice.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingOvertreatmentAdultFemaleHumansMiddle Agedbiomedicalisationbreast cancercancer riskDCISovertreatmentsurveillance medicine

Identifiers

PMID41614315
PMCPMC12856781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.