ArticleCancer science2026
Refining Tumor Mutational Burden as a Predictive Biomarker for Pembrolizumab: A Real-World Analysis in Japanese Patients.
Article in Cancer science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is a key biomarker for predicting the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, its predictive accuracy in real-world clinical practice, particularly in Asian populations, remains inadequately evaluated. We addressed this issue by analyzing real-world data from 63,952 patients registered in the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT) database, which integrates genomic and clinical information from Japanese patients with various advanced solid tumors. We assessed the therapeutic efficacy of pembrolizumab in 1899 patients who underwent one of three comprehensive genomic profiling tests: FoundationOne CDx, the OncoGuide NCC Oncopanel System, or the GenMine TOP Cancer Genome Profiling System. Based on the reported TMB values, patients were classified as TMB-high (≥ 10 mutations per megabase) or TMB-low (< 10 mutations per megabase). The objective response rate (ORR) among 946 TMB-high patients exceeded 30% and was significantly higher than that observed in 953 TMB-low patients (16.8%, p < 0.001). Notably, patients with borderline TMB values (10 to less than 13 mutations per megabase) exhibited relatively modest responses (20.8%). The ORR improved when hotspot mutations were excluded from the TMB calculation, suggesting that this adjustment enhances the predictive accuracy of TMB. These findings support the clinical utility of TMB as a biomarker for predicting ICI response in routine oncology practice. In particular, excluding hotspot mutations from TMB calculations may improve response prediction in patients whose TMB values are near the threshold.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.