ArticleNanoscale advances2026
High reliability Ag/Ni/NiO nanowire-based SERS for cancer detection: a study on breast cancer.
Article in Nanoscale advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past decade, substantial research has focused on identifying cancer biomarkers using Raman spectroscopy. However, no commercial Raman-based diagnostic tests are currently available. A major barrier is the need to amplify the inherently weak Raman signal, typically achieved through Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS). Because SERS relies on nanostructured substrates, its clinical translation has been hindered primarily by poor reproducibility, which undermines data reliability and prevents regulatory approval. In this pilot study, we evaluate an improved SERS substrate based on Ag/Ni/NiO nanowires, previously reported by our group, which significantly enhances sensitivity, specificity, detection limits, and critically substrate reproducibility. We further strengthen analytical performance by incorporating machine learning methods for spectral interpretation. Using this optimized platform, we analyzed SERS spectra from tissue samples of 31 breast cancer patients and compared them with matched healthy controls. Our results demonstrate a clear spectral distinction between cancerous and non-cancerous tissue. More importantly, we showed that SERS combined with machine learning, can differentiate major breast cancer subtypes, including luminal A (LUMA), luminal B (LUMB), HER2-enriched (HER2), and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). PCA-LDA modeling yielded exceptional diagnostic metrics, achieving up to 99% accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity across multiple classification tasks. Although this pilot study includes a limited number of samples, the findings demonstrate that improved SERS substrates paired with machine-learning analysis can generate a unique molecular fingerprint of breast cancer and its subtypes. This work opens a pathway for developing assays, potentially using blood or saliva, to enable early detection and subtype identification based on SERS-derived cancer fingerprints.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.