Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41614087›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2025

Case Report: Radical urethrectomy with partial cystectomy and bladder outlet reconstruction in giant female urethral adenocarcinoma infiltrating the bladder: A rare case report.

Rio Rahmadi, Utari Mudhia Arisa Putri, Hendra Herman, Wendi Rachman, Randy Fauzan, Ardiansyah Periadi Sitompul

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rio RahmadiUrology Department, Raden Mattaher Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Jambi, universitas jambi, Jambi, Indonesia, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9281-1276
Utari Mudhia Arisa PutriUrology Department, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital/Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, university of indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4108-7576
Hendra HermanUrology Department, Raden Mattaher Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Jambi, universitas jambi, Jambi, Indonesia, Indonesia.
Wendi RachmanUrology Department, Raden Mattaher Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Jambi, universitas jambi, Jambi, Indonesia, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1023-493X
Randy FauzanUrology Department, Raden Mattaher Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Jambi, universitas jambi, Jambi, Indonesia, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9802-0015
Ardiansyah Periadi SitompulUrology Department, Raden Mattaher Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Jambi, universitas jambi, Jambi, Indonesia, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Female urethral adenocarcinoma (FUA) is an exceptionally rare and aggressive malignancy, accounting for less than 0.02% of all cancers in women. Its nonspecific symptoms often lead to delayed diagnosis, with many cases detected at advanced stages. The rarity of FUA, particularly when presenting with a large mass, underscores the challenges in developing standardized treatment protocols. Case Presentation: A 65-year-old woman presented with urinary retention. Clinical examination revealed a large mass obstructing the urethral orifice. A computed tomography (CT) scan showed a malignant mass involving the entire length of urethra, with no signs of metastasis. Percutaneous cystostomy was performed, and cystoscopy through the cystostomy access revealed tumor infiltration into the anterior bladder wall, approximately 2 cm from the bladder neck. A radical urethrectomy with partial cystectomy and bladder outlet reconstruction was performed via a transurethral approach, with antegrade cystoscopy guidance. The bladder outlet was reconstructed using a segment of the anterior bladder wall to facilitate voiding through the orthotopic site with a Foley catheter. Pathology confirmed pT4 urethral adenocarcinoma with enteric subtype and clear surgical margins. Neither radiation nor chemotherapy was administered. At the 1-year follow-up, the patient was in continuous incontinence status. This condition is expected since the sphincter was also resected during the surgery as the tumor already infiltrated the anterior bladder. But with the use of silicone catheter, we can avoid any leak and patient still can void timely through regularly clamp catheter. At the 1-year follow-up, the patient reported satisfaction with her quality of life and showed no signs of recurrence or metastasis. Conclusion: This case highlights the feasibility of bladder-preserving surgical techniques in giant FUA with bladder infiltration. The approach achieved oncological control while maintaining the patient's quality of life. Bladder outlet reconstruction provided satisfactory functional outcomes and eliminated the need for suprapubic urinary diversion.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCystectomyPlastic Surgery ProceduresUrethral NeoplasmsUrinary BladderUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansUrethraKeywords: Female urethral adenocarcinomapartial cystectomyradical urethrectomyurethral cancer management

Identifiers

PMID41614087
PMCPMC12848345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.