ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Beyond the label: real-world gastrointestinal adverse events associated with vedolizumab - a decade of FAERS pharmacovigilance.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vedolizumab is a gut-selective biologic widely used for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide initial safety profiles, real-world pharmacovigilance data are crucial for identifying a broader spectrum of adverse events (AEs), including rare or underrecognized associations. This study aimed to comprehensively characterize the real-world reporting frequency and characteristics of gastrointestinal AEs associated with vedolizumab using spontaneous reporting data. Methods: We analyzed 59,976 vedolizumab-related individual case safety reports from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, covering the period from Q1 2014 to Q4 2024. After meticulous exclusion of IBD diagnostic terms, 17,943 mentions of vedolizumab-associated gastrointestinal AEs were included. Disproportionality analysis, employing reporting odds ratios (ROR) with a threshold of ≥20 cases and a 95% confidence interval lower bound >1, was performed to detect significant signals. Descriptive analyses, time-to-onset (TTO) analysis, and a semi-quantitative clinical relevance assessment system were also utilized. Results: Disproportionality analysis identified 95 significant gastrointestinal AE preferred terms (PTs). Common and strongly signaled events included diarrhea, abdominal pain, haematochezia, and frequent bowel movements. Notably, 70 of these 95 significant PTs (73.7%) are not explicitly listed in the current vedolizumab drug label, suggesting potential novel or underrecognized associations. Most reported AEs were serious (90.09%). Analysis of demographic data revealed significant differences in the proportion of serious reports across gender, weight, and age groups. Males (91.44%) and patients in the <50 kg group (87.30%) had higher proportions of serious reports. Notably, adult patients (18∼65 years) showed a higher proportion of serious outcomes compared to pediatric and elderly groups, although this finding may be influenced by data completeness bias. The median time-to-onset for gastrointestinal AEs was 190 days. Conclusion: This comprehensive real-world FAERS analysis identifies both known and a substantial number of previously underrecognized gastrointestinal AEs associated with vedolizumab. The high proportion of serious events, particularly observed in male patients and those with lower body weight, underscores the need for enhanced clinical vigilance and targeted monitoring, especially early in the treatment course. These hypothesis-generating findings warrant further validation through dedicated clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.