Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41614066›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025

Perceptions of the Furhat social robot administering a mental health assessment: a pilot mixed-method exploration.

Paulina Tsvetkova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Paulina TsvetkovaInstitute of Robotics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the era of artificial intelligence and rapidly advancing robotics, the field of Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) has taken center stage across multiple domains, including psychology. From a psychological perspective, it is therefore essential to deepen our understanding of the factors that shape the quality of these interactions and their implications. This emphasis also aligns with the principles of Industry 5.0, which prioritize human well-being and use technologies to promote sustainable progress. The present study employs an exploratory mixed-method approach and aims to examine perceptions of warmth, competence and discomfort with the Furhat social robot in a psychological assessment setting. Specifically, we investigated young adults' interactions with the Furhat social robot while it administered the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). Following the interaction, the participants completed the short version of the Robot Social Attributes Scale (RoSAS-SF) to assess perceived warmth, competence and discomfort, and provided qualitative feedback regarding their interactional experiences and acceptance of the robot. The findings provide preliminary insights into the respondents' perceptions of and openness toward robot-administered psychological screening, suggesting that the Furhat social robot may have potential as an assistive tool in mental health assessment contexts. These results highlight the need for further research with larger samples to examine the role of social robots in psychological practice more comprehensively.

Indexed as

competencediscomfortFurhat robothuman-robot interactionmental healthperceptionspsychological assessmentwarmth

Identifiers

PMID41614066
PMCPMC12847930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.