ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2025
PreBP: an interpretable, optimized ensemble framework using routine complete blood count for rapid pathogen identification in bacterial pneumonia.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bacterial pneumonia remains a major global health challenge, and early pathogen identification is important for timely and targeted treatment. However, conventional microbiological diagnostics such as sputum or blood culture are labor-intensive and time-consuming. Methods: We propose an interpretable ensemble learning framework (PreBP) for rapid pathogen identification using routinely available complete blood count (CBC) parameters. We analyzed 1,334 CBC samples from patients with culture-confirmed bacterial pneumonia caused by four major pathogens: Results: PreBP achieved the best overall performance, with an AUC of 0.920, precision of 87.1%, and accuracy and sensitivity of 86.7%. Discussion: Because the framework relies on routine CBC measurements, it can generate interpretable predictions once CBC results are available, which may provide supplementary evidence for earlier pathogen-oriented clinical decision-making alongside culture-dependent workflows. Overall, PreBP offers an interpretable and computational approach for pathogen identification in bacterial pneumonia based on routine laboratory data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.