Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41614048›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

Neurosynth Compose: A web-based platform for flexible and reproducible neuroimaging meta-analysis.

James D Kent, Nicholas Lee, Angela R Laird, Taylor Salo, Julio Peraza, Katherine L Bottenhorn, Kendra Oudyk, Thomas E Nichols, Jean-Baptiste Poline, Alejandro de la Vega

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

James D KentDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Nicholas LeeDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Angela R LairdDepartment of Physics, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.
Taylor SaloPenn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Julio PerazaDepartment of Physics, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.
Katherine L BottenhornDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Kendra OudykMcConnell Brain Imaging Centre, The Neuro (Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital), McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4087-5402
Thomas E NicholsNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jean-Baptiste PolineMcConnell Brain Imaging Centre, The Neuro (Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital), McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Alejandro de la VegaDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9062-3778

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid growth of the functional neuroimaging literature presents significant challenges for synthesizing findings across studies. Although automated meta-analysis platforms such as Neurosynth.org facilitate large-scale literature exploration, their capacity for addressing nuanced research questions is limited. As a result, manual meta-analyses remain prevalent despite being highly time intensive, often suffering from limited reproducibility, and frequently resulting in the loss of valuable expert-curated data due to idiosyncratic workflows. To address these limitations, we introduce Neurosynth Compose, a web-based platform designed to streamline the creation of transparent, reproducible, and high-quality neuroimaging meta-analyses. Neurosynth Compose features a user-friendly interface for study curation and annotation, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, and is integrated with NeuroStore, a centralized database containing over 30,000 studies with pre-extracted activation coordinates. Meta-analytic models are specified using the Neuroimaging Meta-Analysis Data Standard (NiMADS) and executed via the comprehensive NiMARE Python library, which supports diverse coordinate- and image-based algorithms. Analyses can be executed locally or in the cloud using portable execution bundles, and results are uploaded back to the online platform, facilitating interactive review and rapid sharing to colleagues and the community. By combining automated data collection with expert-guided study selection and powerful analysis tools in an open and flexible system, Neurosynth Compose streamlines the process of creating high-quality neuroimaging meta-analyses. At the same time, this open and collaborative framework encourages users to share their valuable annotations and meta-analyses, fostering a valuable crowdsourced knowledge base, and enabling users to update existing meta-analyses, paving the way for "living" syntheses that can be updated as new research emerges.

Indexed as

cognitive neurosciencefMRIinformaticsmeta-analysisneuroimagingopen-source

Identifiers

PMID41614048
PMCPMC12849227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.