Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41614029›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2025

Adaptive modulation of microsaccades and saccade dynamics by global luminance.

Chao-Yin Kuo, Chi-Hung Juan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chao-Yin KuoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Chi-Hung JuanInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, National Central University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Microsaccades, a type of fixational eye movements occurring during visual fixation, are actively involved in the foveal vision and often linked to various attention and cognitive processes. Moreover, microsaccades are increasingly recognized as part of active adaptive mechanisms to continuously changing sensory environments. However, it remains unclear whether they also adjust to changes in luminance as part of this adaptive mechanism, and whether such luminance-regulated microsaccade responses are functionally significant. Methods: Total forty participants were recruited in the saccade task with their eye position and pupil size measured by a video-based eye tracker. Participants were instructed to maintain fixation on a central spot and then execute a saccade to a peripheral target stimulus immediately upon detection. We systematically varied the background luminance while keeping foveal luminance constant, by which, allows isolation the effects of global luminance on microsaccade generation. We analyzed the effects of experimental condition (background luminance or stimulus contrast) on microsaccadic responses, microsaccadic suppression effects and the saccadic metrics. Results: We found that darker background luminance systemically increased microsaccade rates ( Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that microsaccade behavior changes as a function of global luminance level, suggesting its adaptive role as part of the oculomotor network. They also suggest a potential role for luminance-driven modulation of superior colliculus activity in oculomotor activities. Taken together, our results offer a new insight into visual-motor coordination under naturalistic conditions.

Indexed as

global luminancemicrosaccadepupillometrysaccade metricsstimulus contrastsuperior colliculus

Identifiers

PMID41614029
PMCPMC12847425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.