ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2026
Effect of prophylactic antibiotics on days of antibiotic spectrum coverage in comatose post-cardiac arrest patients: a secondary analysis of PROTECT.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Antibiotic resistance is a threat to public health driven in part by widespread antibiotic administration. Days of antibiotic spectrum coverage (DASC) is a novel metric to quantify both duration and breadth of antibiotic exposure that has not previously been used as an endpoint in a clinical trial. We calculated DASC using data from the Ceftriaxone to Prevent Pneumonia and Inflammation after Cardiac Arrest (PROTECT) trial to determine the association of ceftriaxone prophylaxis with DASC and with the acquisition of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). Methods: PROTECT randomized out-of-hospital cardiac arrest subjects to ceftriaxone or placebo for 3 days. ARGs were measured from rectal swabs collected at Days 0, 3 and 7 post randomization. DASC was calculated for each subject and compared using a two-sided Mann-Whitney Results: PROTECT enrolled 52 subjects, 26 per treatment group, and treatment groups were similar at baseline. Median DASC scores were lower in the ceftriaxone group (19.5; IQR: 0, 43) compared with placebo (53; IQR: 16, 81). We found no correlation between DASC and new ARGs at either timepoint, or between DASC and AFD. DASC was correlated with DOT. Conclusions: DASC post intervention was lower in the ceftriaxone group, representing less antibiotic exposure following the intervention. There was no correlation between new ARGs and DASC. Further study is needed to understand the relationship between antibiotic prophylaxis, subsequent antibiotic exposure and resistome changes in the critically ill.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.