ArticleDigital health
Cleft lip and palate-generative pre-trained transformer: A parameter-efficient, domain-specific language model for cleft lip and palate clinical applications.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: General-purpose large language models (LLMs) often lack specialized knowledge for cleft lip and palate (CLP), limiting clinical utility. Accessible, accurate, and affordable AI tools could potentially supplement existing educational resources for clinicians and patients. Objective: To develop and evaluate CLP-generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), a parameter-efficient model fine-tuned for CLP, and to assess whether a smaller specialized model can achieve performance comparable to large generalist models for clinical deployment. Method: We built a CLP dataset of 7815 validated Q&A pairs from medical dialogs, literature, and guidelines. Using Qwen2-7B-Instruct as the base, we applied low-rank adaptation for domain adaptation. Performance was assessed via physician- and patient-oriented subjective evaluations and an objective test of 135 specialized multiple-choice questions. Result: CLP-GPT showed significant improvements over its baseline across all dimensions (p < 0.001). In physician evaluations, its accuracy surpassed Claude-3.5-Sonnet and Gemini-1.5-Pro (p < 0.05) and showed no significant differences from models like GPT-4o (p > 0.05). In patient evaluations, CLP-GPT performed comparably to leading large models across all dimensions (p > 0.05). On the objective test, it achieved the highest accuracy (71.85%), though differences among models were not statistically significant. Conclusion: CLP-GPT, a parameter-efficient, domain-specific model, delivers performance comparable to other LLMs in CLP. This demonstrates that cost-effective, specialized models can achieve high performance without massive computational resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.