Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41613986›Full record

ReviewDigital health

On the use of synthetic data for healthcare AI in Africa: Technical performance, governance challenges, and policy readiness.

Ally Nyamawe, Deo Shao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ally NyamaweInformation Systems and Technology, University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Deo ShaoInformation Systems and Technology, University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8055-9984

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Synthetic data has emerged as a promising solution to overcome the shortage of clinical datasets needed for training healthcare artificial intelligence (AI) models. This study examined how synthetic data can support AI development in Africa's healthcare by analyzing its technical performance, fidelity limitations, and governance implications within low-resource health systems. Methods: A Critical Literature Review was conducted on scholarly and technical literature focused on the use of synthetic data for AI in healthcare across African settings. Databases searched included Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Thematic analysis identified trends in synthetic data generation, fidelity, domain adaptation, and adoption challenges in African healthcare AI. Results: Drawing on interdisciplinary evidence, the analysis demonstrates how addressing technical challenges, improving synthetic data fidelity, leveraging domain adaptation techniques, and confronting practical adoption barriers are critical to enhancing the reliability and applicability of synthetic data for AI-driven healthcare in Africa. Four themes emerged from the analysis. First, hybrid synthetic-real datasets consistently outperform synthetic-only models. Second, fidelity gaps introduced bias risk and misclassification. Third, domain adaptation remains underused in low-resource contexts. Fourth, infrastructure gaps, weak regulation, and clinician skepticism hindered the adoption of synthetic data. Conclusion: Synthetic data can enhance AI-enabled healthcare in Africa if it is embedded within regulatory frameworks, validated through hybrid modeling, and supported by investment in infrastructure and capacity-building. This study highlights the intersection of synthetic data, healthcare AI, data fidelity, domain adaptation, and governance considerations in African health systems, underscoring the need for robust health technology assessment processes.

Indexed as

Africaartificial intelligenceeHealth systemshealthcare policyhealth technology assessmentSynthetic data

Identifiers

PMID41613986
PMCPMC12847688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.