Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41613925›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025

Interpretable machine learning models for predicting cognitive impairment using NHANES neuropsychological tests: nutritional and sociodemographic associations.

Li Song, Chenlu Li, Xiaojiao Xiang, Peijia Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Li SongDepartment of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Chenlu LiDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital Of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Major Neurological and Mental Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Neurology, Chongqing, China.
Xiaojiao Xiang *Department of Nuclear Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Peijia Lin *Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Children and Adolescents' Health and Diseases, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early identification of individuals at risk for cognitive impairment is essential for timely intervention and public health planning. While sociodemographic and clinical predictors are well recognized, the role of nutrition and its interactions in cognitive health remains less explored. Methods: Using data from the 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, Results: Ensemble models demonstrated excellent predictive performance, consistently outperforming traditional classifiers. Key predictors included education, age, socioeconomic status, and chronic disease conditions. Among nutritional factors, vitamin B2 emerged as consistently associated with lower predicted cognitive impairment risk across all three models, with notable interactions observed with copper and vitamin E. Exploratory Conclusion: Interpretable machine learning models integrating cognitive tests with demographic, clinical, and nutritional variables can accurately predict cognitive impairment. Nutritional predictors, particularly vitamin B2 and its interactions, may contribute to model performance and biological plausibility, suggesting potential avenues for stratified monitoring strategies.

Indexed as

BDNFcognitive impairmentNHANESnutrient synergyoxidative stressSHAPSIRT1vitamin B2

Identifiers

PMID41613925
PMCPMC12847056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.