ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Interpretable machine learning models for predicting cognitive impairment using NHANES neuropsychological tests: nutritional and sociodemographic associations.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a machine learning-based predictive model for carotid plaque in type 2 diabetes.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early identification of individuals at risk for cognitive impairment is essential for timely intervention and public health planning. While sociodemographic and clinical predictors are well recognized, the role of nutrition and its interactions in cognitive health remains less explored. Methods: Using data from the 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, Results: Ensemble models demonstrated excellent predictive performance, consistently outperforming traditional classifiers. Key predictors included education, age, socioeconomic status, and chronic disease conditions. Among nutritional factors, vitamin B2 emerged as consistently associated with lower predicted cognitive impairment risk across all three models, with notable interactions observed with copper and vitamin E. Exploratory Conclusion: Interpretable machine learning models integrating cognitive tests with demographic, clinical, and nutritional variables can accurately predict cognitive impairment. Nutritional predictors, particularly vitamin B2 and its interactions, may contribute to model performance and biological plausibility, suggesting potential avenues for stratified monitoring strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.