ReviewCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2025
Redefining the modern paradigm of vasopressor therapy for vasodilatory shock.
Review in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CSA-13 treatment in a murine model of Pseudomonas pneumonia-induced sepsis and its effects on renal injury, inflammation, and glycocalyx derangement.The Journal of antibiotics · 2026Article
- Pathological triad of perioperative acute kidney injury: renal microcirculatory hypoxia, mitochondrial damage, and immuno-metabolic reprogramming.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vasodilatory shock remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the intensive care unit. Vasopressors are the cornerstone of treatment when vasodilatory shock persists despite adequate fluid resuscitation, yet their effects on organ-specific blood flow, perfusion, and oxygenation are complex and may contribute to harm. This review summarises the extensive contributions of Professor Rinaldo Bellomo to advancing our knowledge of vasopressor therapy in clinical practice. Central to his work was the concept of personalised haemodynamic targets, introduced through the concept of "mean perfusion pressure deficit", which linked premorbid perfusion pressure to outcomes and challenged the universal application of a mean arterial pressure threshold of ≥65 mmHg. In collaboration with Professor Clive May, Bellomo established a chronically instrumented large animal model of hyperdynamic sepsis, yielding fundamental insights into the discordance between the macrocirculation and microcirculation, the vulnerability of the renal medulla to hypoxia, and the mechanisms of septic acute kidney injury. This model enabled direct comparison of vasopressor drugs in both healthy animals and during septic shock, demonstrating their heterogeneous effects on global and regional blood flow, perfusion, and tissue oxygenation. Knowledge translation to the bedside was achieved through the conduct of pivotal clinical trials, from early studies refuting the utility of "renal-dose dopamine" to landmark contributions to the ATHOS (angiotensin II treatment of high-ouput shock) program, which established angiotensin II as a novel vasopressor in refractory vasodilatory shock. Collectively, Bellomo's work has transformed vasopressor therapy from empirical convention towards individualised practice, and it continues to inform clinical investigation and guideline development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.