Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41613885›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2025

Prospects and problems in enzyme immobilization methodology: comprehensive review.

Marina G Holyavka, Valeriy G Artyukhov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marina G HolyavkaBiophysics and Biotechnology Department, Voronezh State University, 1 Universitetskaya Ploshchad, Voronezh, 394018 Russia.
Valeriy G ArtyukhovBiophysics and Biotechnology Department, Voronezh State University, 1 Universitetskaya Ploshchad, Voronezh, 394018 Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The applications of immobilized enzymes in industry are progressively increasing. Methodological aspects of engineering enzymology are largely determined by immobilization approaches. Using enzymes as biocatalysts provides advantages such as mild reaction conditions, environmental biodegradability, and high catalytic efficiency. Nevertheless, the extreme conditions often found in industrial settings can destabilize enzymes, reducing their operational durability in manufacturing applications. Immobilization of enzymes is a common practice, mainly in order to minimize enzyme costs on the process economics by making it possible to reuse the enzyme many times and also minimize the operation cost as the immobilization technique may be modify the enzyme behavior, thus reducing the enzyme and product costs significantly. Many techniques have been used previously for enzyme immobilization, such as adsorption, entrapment, encapsulation, covalent binding, and cross-linking. This review provides a comparative analysis of covalent and non-covalent methods of enzyme immobilization, and briefly outlines the main issues and prospects of their practical use in both analytical practice and industrial biotechnology and medicine. These techniques alter enzyme characteristics by modifying the surrounding microenvironment and adjusting the extent of multipoint binding. As a result, analyzing the enzyme's structural changes after attachment to the support surface is essential. Advanced nanoscale characterization tools play a vital role in examining surface-immobilized enzymes, providing key qualitative and quantitative insights, such as morphological visualization, into their behavior. Such analytical techniques are critical for evaluating the success of immobilization methods and guiding the design of future enzyme stabilization strategies. Special attention is paid to computer methods of analysis of immobilized enzymes. Importantly, while simulations have been primarily performed to rationalize the molecular aspects of the immobilization event, their use to predict adequate protocols that can control its impact on the enzyme properties is, up to date, mostly missing. Artificial intelligence and machine learning have been also successfully applied for optimization of the immobilization process and predictive modeling of unmeasured parameters. Using advanced analytics, they optimize biocatalytic processes by analyzing experimental data, forecasting immobilization parameters, and developing high-performance enzyme designs. Thus, this review summarizes various new immobilization techniques, limitations, prospects and applications of immobilized enzymes.

Indexed as

AdsorptionCovalent bindingCross-linkingDesigning enzyme formulationsEncapsulationEntrapmentEnzyme immobilization

Identifiers

PMID41613885
PMCPMC12847602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.