Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41613882›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2025

Cellulose and cellulose-based materials for enzyme immobilization: a review.

Maria S Lavlinskaya, Andrey V Sorokin, Marina G Holyavka, Yuriy F Zuev, Valeriy G Artyukhov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria S LavlinskayaBiophysics and Biotechnology Department, Voronezh State University, 1 Universitetskaya Ploshchad, Voronezh, 394018 Russia.
Andrey V SorokinBiophysics and Biotechnology Department, Voronezh State University, 1 Universitetskaya Ploshchad, Voronezh, 394018 Russia.
Marina G HolyavkaBiophysics and Biotechnology Department, Voronezh State University, 1 Universitetskaya Ploshchad, Voronezh, 394018 Russia.
Yuriy F ZuevKazan Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, FRC Kazan Scientific Center of the RAS, 2/31 Lobachevsky Street, Kazan, 420111 Russia.
Valeriy G ArtyukhovBiophysics and Biotechnology Department, Voronezh State University, 1 Universitetskaya Ploshchad, Voronezh, 394018 Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enzymes are highly efficient natural catalysts with exceptional selectivity, often surpassing synthetic alternatives in accelerating chemical reactions. Their water solubility enables their application in various technological processes aligned with modern green chemistry trends. However, enhancing enzyme performance is often necessary, primarily by improving reusability and extending their operational lifespan. A promising strategy to achieve these goals is enzyme immobilization, particularly on cellulose. Cellulose, the most abundant biopolymer, possesses valuable properties such as cost-effectiveness and low toxicity, making it an ideal candidate for applications in food and biomedical technologies. Additionally, cellulose-based immobilization can contribute to the development of enzyme formulations with improved catalytic efficiency and stability. This review summarizes over two hundred studies conducted in the past decade on enzyme immobilization on cellulose and its derivatives, emphasizing its effects on enzymatic activity and performance.

Indexed as

CelluloseCellulose compositesEnzyme immobilizationEnzyme performanceFunctionalized cellulose

Identifiers

PMID41613882
PMCPMC12847574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.