ReviewBiophysical reviews2025
Machine learning interatomic potentials in biomolecular modeling: principles, architectures, and applications.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using structure to evaluate the accuracy and transferability of machine learning potentials of biomolecules.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Driven Advances in Perovskite Materials and Solar Cells.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Free energy calculations in molecular modeling: from classical methods to machine learning.Journal of molecular modeling · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Classical force fields remain widely used in molecular modeling due to their efficiency but fail to accurately capture reactivity and complex environments. Quantum mechanical methods like DFT offer higher accuracy but are computationally prohibitive for large biomolecules. Machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) bridge this gap by approximating potential energy surfaces with near-DFT precision while enabling large-scale simulations. MLIPs learn directly from quantum data and can generalize across diverse chemical environments. This review outlines the theoretical basis of MLIPs, including training on energy and force data, symmetry constraints, and common architectures-ranging from descriptor-based to graph-based and equivariant neural networks. Key applications are examined in biomolecular contexts: conformational sampling, enzymatic catalysis, and ligand binding. Integration with molecular dynamics packages like OpenMM and LAMMPS is increasingly streamlined. While challenges remain-such as generalization to out-of-distribution systems, limited interpretability, and data scarcity-ongoing advances in datasets, hybrid modeling, and infrastructure are rapidly improving practical adoption. MLIPs represent a major step forward in atomistic simulations and are poised to become central tools in structural biology, enzymology, and computational drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.