ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
INTegRated InterveNtion of pSychogerIatric Care: real-world application and implementation of an advanced integrated telehealth system incorporating machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Older individuals who suffer from mental disorders may encounter accessibility difficulties related to factors such as remoteness and socioeconomic status. The present analysis provides empirical evidence from the INTegRated InterveNtion of pSychogerIatric Care (INTRINSIC) and shows that this network could aid towards the incorporation of tele-psychiatry and tele-neuropsychology into primary healthcare. We propose that such integration, situated within comprehensive health digitalization initiatives, represents a scalable approach to expanding mental health access. Methods: 1,143 individuals from 2022 to 2025, from 11 different sites of INTRINSIC were recruited. Data collection was facilitated via the HEllenic Remote MEntal health Services for old-age (HERMES) Digital Platform, including demographic information, Mini-Cog scores, as well as information based on the Old Age Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (OLA-BRFSS). A machine learning (ML) model was developed, trained, and evaluated using nested cross-validation. The classification analysis outcome was the Mini-Cog scores and eighty-three known risk factors were analyzed. Features were selected using Elastic Net regularization. A Random Forest classifier was then trained on the selected feature, and was employed to classify individuals into two Mini-Cog cognitive performance groups. Results: The ML algorithm employed in this study revealed eight features to be positively associated with low Mini-Cog scores, including subjective complaints of cognitive problems, retirement, polypharmacy, and history of falls. Five variables demonstrated a positive association with higher Mini-Cog scores, including prior diagnosis of an anxiety disorder, insomnia, and physical exercise. The model achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.76 (Figure 3 and Table 4), with a BAC of 0.65. Discussion: The present paper presents the first large-scale study on INTRINSIC, including multiple sites and integrating psychiatric, cognitive, medical, as well as sociodemographic variables in state-of-the-art ML models. Our results add to the existing literature on the complex interrelationships of factors affecting cognitive status in older individuals. We propose that INSTRINSIC may function as a benchmark for integrating psychiatric and neuropsychological services within primary healthcare settings, thereby addressing disparities in access to care and diagnostic equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.