Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41613845›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

How does career calling influence doctoral students' academic resilience:a moderated serial mediation model.

Chibin Zhang, Dexian Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chibin ZhangFaculty of Education, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China.
Dexian LiFaculty of Education, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Academic resilience, as a core competency reflecting perseverance and positive adaptation in academic adversity, demonstrates doctoral students' enduring passion and vitality for academic careers. Grounded in Career Construction Theory and Ecological Systems Theory, this study aims to empirically test a theoretically derived moderated serial mediation model explaining how and under what conditions career calling fosters academic resilience among doctoral students. Data were collected from 865 doctoral students using the Career Calling Scale, Career Adapt-Abilities Scale-Short Form, Perceived Future Decent Work Scale, Academic Resilience Scale, and Decent Work Scale. Results showed that career calling was positively associated with academic resilience; career adaptability partially mediated the relationship between career calling and academic resilience; perceived future decent work partially mediated the relationship between career calling and academic resilience; career adaptability and perceived future decent work exerted a serial mediating effect in the impact of career calling on academic resilience; decent work positively moderated the relationships between career calling and academic resilience, career adaptability and academic resilience, and perceived future decent work and academic resilience. These findings extend theoretical understanding by integrating individual and contextual perspectives to reveal the multi-layered mechanisms of resilience formation in doctoral education, while offering actionable implications for enhancing calling education, fostering adaptability, and improving decent-work conditions. However, as the study relied on cross-sectional self-report data from Chinese doctoral students, future research should employ longitudinal and cross-cultural designs to strengthen causal inference and generalizability.

Indexed as

academic resiliencecareer adaptabilitycareer callingdecent workdoctoral students

Identifiers

PMID41613845
PMCPMC12847361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.