Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41613742›Full record

ReviewFocus (American Psychiatric Publishing)2025

A Call to Action for Starting Clozapine: Increasing Clozapine Use and Safety in a Post-REMS Era.

Jonathan G Leung, Robert O Cotes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jonathan G LeungDepartment of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3836-9375
Robert O CotesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9903-8807

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clozapine remains the only medication approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for managing treatment-resistant schizophrenia and for reducing the risk of recurrent suicidal behavior in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Despite its known benefits, its use remains suboptimal with non-evidence-based treatments often trialed before clozapine. These delays have been shown to reduce the likelihood of clozapine response or increase the risk of early discontinuation. With the elimination of the Clozapine Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy program, one barrier that had impeded clozapine use has been negated. However, barriers persist that are related to clinicians' perceptions of clozapine and knowledge related to appropriate titration, monitoring, and management of adverse drug reactions. With a growing body of evidence suggesting that current FDA-recommended hematologic monitoring is overly cautious, there is future potential that these requirements become less stringent. This marks an important time to bring forth a call to action for increased use of clozapine and focus on important clozapine-related initiation and monitoring strategies. Such strategies include slower initial titration, understanding differences in clozapine metabolism across different genetic ancestry groups, awareness of inflammatory reactions, recognition of pneumonia-related mortality, and appropriate bowel care. This review highlights best and evidence-based practices to help clinicians increase clozapine prescribing and ensure that patients have the greatest opportunity for a successful, potentially life-saving clozapine trial.

Indexed as

AntipsychoticsClozapineSchizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic DisordersSecond Generation Antipsychotics

Identifiers

PMID41613742
PMCPMC12818699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.