ReviewFocus (American Psychiatric Publishing)2025
A Call to Action for Starting Clozapine: Increasing Clozapine Use and Safety in a Post-REMS Era.
Review in Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clozapine-Associated Neutropenia among People on Clozapine in Japan: A Nationally Representative Retrospective Cohort Study.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clozapine remains the only medication approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for managing treatment-resistant schizophrenia and for reducing the risk of recurrent suicidal behavior in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Despite its known benefits, its use remains suboptimal with non-evidence-based treatments often trialed before clozapine. These delays have been shown to reduce the likelihood of clozapine response or increase the risk of early discontinuation. With the elimination of the Clozapine Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy program, one barrier that had impeded clozapine use has been negated. However, barriers persist that are related to clinicians' perceptions of clozapine and knowledge related to appropriate titration, monitoring, and management of adverse drug reactions. With a growing body of evidence suggesting that current FDA-recommended hematologic monitoring is overly cautious, there is future potential that these requirements become less stringent. This marks an important time to bring forth a call to action for increased use of clozapine and focus on important clozapine-related initiation and monitoring strategies. Such strategies include slower initial titration, understanding differences in clozapine metabolism across different genetic ancestry groups, awareness of inflammatory reactions, recognition of pneumonia-related mortality, and appropriate bowel care. This review highlights best and evidence-based practices to help clinicians increase clozapine prescribing and ensure that patients have the greatest opportunity for a successful, potentially life-saving clozapine trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.