Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41613738›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Importance of Considering the Duplex Collecting System During Routine Endourological Procedures: A Case Report.

Mahdi Mottaghi, Pranay Manda, Ernest A Morton, Mohammad Hajiha

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mahdi MottaghiDepartment of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA.
Pranay MandaDepartment of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA.
Ernest A MortonDepartment of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA.
Mohammad HajihaDepartment of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the case of a 58-year-old woman who initially presented to the emergency department with intermittent nausea, vomiting, and left upper quadrant abdominal pain for six days. As part of the abdominal pain workup in the emergency department, contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT and laboratory assessment were performed, which were consistent with pyelonephritis secondary to a distal ureteral stone. Interestingly, while the imaging failed to detect any significant anatomic variation, a duplicated collecting system was diagnosed during ureteral stent placement. Recognition of this anomaly was crucial for successful patient management. Awareness of anatomic variants is essential during endourological procedures, as diagnostic imaging may not reliably detect them.

Indexed as

bifid or double ureternephrolithiasisureteral obstructionureteral stentsurogenital abnormalities

Identifiers

PMID41613738
PMCPMC12850993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.